|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Warren
Coach
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Last Visit: 31 May 2017
Posts: 2575
Topics: 299
Location: Spain
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 10:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Crawley Dan wrote: | | lee 66 wrote: | | Crawley Dan wrote: | | David R wrote: | | To some nasty anti CTFC bashing, too small for league one etc. |
We are tinpot, and if they are saying 'too small for league one' then they are only telling the truth. There are plenty of things to back that up. For a start, worst away support in league 1 last season, fifth worst (i think) in the whole football league. Home crowds of about 2800, for league one, is embarrassing. |
Come on Dan behave.We certainly deserve our league one status |
Never said we didn't, I simply was stating facts. We are the smallest club in the league, and that will continue to be the case for some time IMO. I don't care what others think about us, I was simply saying that we are IMO too small for this league. If we were the size of most of the teams in this league, we would think we are too small. However I am more than happy to see us over achieve season after season if it means staying in this league, as it's a great league to be a part of. |
I'd certainly say Fleetwood are smaller than us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lee 66
Coach
Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Last Visit: 23 May 2017
Posts: 2358
Topics: 104
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 10:35 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Warren wrote: | | Crawley Dan wrote: | | lee 66 wrote: | | Crawley Dan wrote: | | David R wrote: | | To some nasty anti CTFC bashing, too small for league one etc. |
We are tinpot, and if they are saying 'too small for league one' then they are only telling the truth. There are plenty of things to back that up. For a start, worst away support in league 1 last season, fifth worst (i think) in the whole football league. Home crowds of about 2800, for league one, is embarrassing. |
Come on Dan behave.We certainly deserve our league one status |
Never said we didn't, I simply was stating facts. We are the smallest club in the league, and that will continue to be the case for some time IMO. I don't care what others think about us, I was simply saying that we are IMO too small for this league. If we were the size of most of the teams in this league, we would think we are too small. However I am more than happy to see us over achieve season after season if it means staying in this league, as it's a great league to be a part of. |
I'd certainly say Fleetwood are smaller than us. |
One mans winkle will be smaller then another mans winkle.It doesn't stop either trying to pull the best looking bird in the disco does it.
Crawley has a small winkle in league terms.It won't stop us competing with the leagues bigger winkles and bringing them down in size will it.
In other words there's more to it then just the size of ones winkle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Astral Voyager
Coach
Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Last Visit: 25 May 2015
Posts: 1834
Topics: 111
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 10:53 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| lee 66 wrote: | | Warren wrote: | | Crawley Dan wrote: | | lee 66 wrote: | | Crawley Dan wrote: | | David R wrote: | | To some nasty anti CTFC bashing, too small for league one etc. |
We are tinpot, and if they are saying 'too small for league one' then they are only telling the truth. There are plenty of things to back that up. For a start, worst away support in league 1 last season, fifth worst (i think) in the whole football league. Home crowds of about 2800, for league one, is embarrassing. |
Come on Dan behave.We certainly deserve our league one status |
Never said we didn't, I simply was stating facts. We are the smallest club in the league, and that will continue to be the case for some time IMO. I don't care what others think about us, I was simply saying that we are IMO too small for this league. If we were the size of most of the teams in this league, we would think we are too small. However I am more than happy to see us over achieve season after season if it means staying in this league, as it's a great league to be a part of. |
I'd certainly say Fleetwood are smaller than us. |
One mans winkle will be smaller then another mans winkle.It doesn't stop either trying to pull the best looking bird in the disco does it.
Crawley has a small winkle in league terms.It won't stop us competing with the leagues bigger winkles and bringing them down in size will it.
In other words there's more to it then just the size of ones winkle. |
Bet Bobson has no such problems  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Paulc222
Assistant Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2011
Last Visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 5070
Topics: 103
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:46 am Post subject:
|
|
|
It's about how you use it too  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian
Director of Football
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Last Visit: 30 May 2017
Posts: 15160
Topics: 214
Location: The Parish of Rusper
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:39 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Simon wrote: | | Crawley69 wrote: | | The only issue I do take up is Dunford interview saying the Drurry and Mcfaz sales and their wages would be reinvested in the squad. I just don't see the players we have signed subsequently account for the half million plus there wages and transfer fees freed up. |
For once in a long time I agree with you here. I remember MD giving that interview. I would love to know what he really meant as I can't recall any signings that would remotely account for their fees and wages. |
MAYBE it's going to be re-invested in the squad... in such a manner that the owners no longer need to plough £30k a week of their own money in  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
backofthenet
Assistant Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2011
Last Visit: 28 May 2017
Posts: 3197
Topics: 421
Location: Oop North
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:02 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| David R wrote: | | I just dont equate being a small club to being 'Tinpot', not even sure what 'Tinpot' means. |
Here are some definitions -
http://www.urbandictionary.com.....erm=Tinpot
I think most clubs in L1 & 2 could fit some of those. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Simon
Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Last Visit: 09 Jul 2017
Posts: 12671
Topics: 380
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:40 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Ian wrote: | | Simon wrote: | | Crawley69 wrote: | | The only issue I do take up is Dunford interview saying the Drurry and Mcfaz sales and their wages would be reinvested in the squad. I just don't see the players we have signed subsequently account for the half million plus there wages and transfer fees freed up. |
For once in a long time I agree with you here. I remember MD giving that interview. I would love to know what he really meant as I can't recall any signings that would remotely account for their fees and wages. |
MAYBE it's going to be re-invested in the squad... in such a manner that the owners no longer need to plough £30k a week of their own money in |
I don't have a problem with that Ian, I have always advocated the club lives within its means even if it is at a lower level than it is now.
However I do believe the club should be open and honest with its communications. The interview with MD on Youtube is very specific - says it WILL be re-invested not in MAYBE re-invested. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian
Director of Football
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Last Visit: 30 May 2017
Posts: 15160
Topics: 214
Location: The Parish of Rusper
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:12 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Simon wrote: | | Ian wrote: | | Simon wrote: | | Crawley69 wrote: | | The only issue I do take up is Dunford interview saying the Drurry and Mcfaz sales and their wages would be reinvested in the squad. I just don't see the players we have signed subsequently account for the half million plus there wages and transfer fees freed up. |
For once in a long time I agree with you here. I remember MD giving that interview. I would love to know what he really meant as I can't recall any signings that would remotely account for their fees and wages. |
MAYBE it's going to be re-invested in the squad... in such a manner that the owners no longer need to plough £30k a week of their own money in |
I don't have a problem with that Ian, I have always advocated the club lives within its means even if it is at a lower level than it is now.
However I do believe the club should be open and honest with its communications. The interview with MD on Youtube is very specific - says it WILL be re-invested not in MAYBE re-invested. |
My point was that it is being reinvested, but MAYBE it's re-investment replaces some or all of the additional funding rather than being in addition to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Warren
Coach
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Last Visit: 31 May 2017
Posts: 2575
Topics: 299
Location: Spain
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NorthgateRed
Assistant Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Last Visit: 28 May 2017
Posts: 5545
Topics: 70
Location: BW Stand
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:41 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Ian wrote: | | Simon wrote: | | Ian wrote: | | Simon wrote: | | Crawley69 wrote: | | The only issue I do take up is Dunford interview saying the Drurry and Mcfaz sales and their wages would be reinvested in the squad. I just don't see the players we have signed subsequently account for the half million plus there wages and transfer fees freed up. |
For once in a long time I agree with you here. I remember MD giving that interview. I would love to know what he really meant as I can't recall any signings that would remotely account for their fees and wages. |
MAYBE it's going to be re-invested in the squad... in such a manner that the owners no longer need to plough £30k a week of their own money in |
I don't have a problem with that Ian, I have always advocated the club lives within its means even if it is at a lower level than it is now.
However I do believe the club should be open and honest with its communications. The interview with MD on Youtube is very specific - says it WILL be re-invested not in MAYBE re-invested. |
My point was that it is being reinvested, but MAYBE it's re-investment replaces some or all of the additional funding rather than being in addition to it. |
I'm sure the refurbished pitch cost quite a bit. Probably where some of the money went. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Calendar
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Profile
Log in
